How do you handle ethical dilemmas related to informed consent and decision-making capacity?

Sample interview questions: How do you handle ethical dilemmas related to informed consent and decision-making capacity?

Sample answer:

As a clinical psychologist, handling ethical dilemmas related to informed consent and decision-making capacity is a critical aspect of my professional practice. When faced with such situations, I adhere to a set of principles and guidelines to ensure ethical decision-making. Here are some steps I take:

  1. Establish a strong foundation: I prioritize building a trusting and respectful relationship with my clients from the very beginning. This involves creating an open and non-judgmental space where clients feel comfortable discussing their concerns and freely expressing their thoughts.

  2. Informed consent process: Before any assessment or intervention begins, I provide comprehensive information about the purpose, nature, and potential risks and benefits of the proposed treatment or evaluation. This includes explaining the limits of confidentiality, potential alternatives, and the right to refuse or withdraw consent at any time.

  3. Assessing decision-making capacity: In situations where an individual’s decision-making capacity is in question, I employ appropriate assessment tools and techniques. This helps me determine if the person has the ability to understand and appreciate the relevant information, weigh the options, and communicate a choice based on their own values and beliefs.

  4. Collaborative decision-making: I strive to involve clients in the decision-making process as much as possible, respecting their autonomy and preferences. This may involve discussing treatment options, potential risks and benefits, and alternative approaches. I aim to empower clients to make informed decisions that align with their goals and values.

  5. Balancing beneficence and autonomy: Ethical dilemmas may arise when a client’s decision conflicts with their best interests or poses potential harm. In such cases, I carefully weigh the principles of beneficence (acting in the client’s best interest) against autonomy (respecting the client’s right to self-determination). This often involves engaging in thorough ethical deliberation, seeking consultation when necessary, and considering relevant legal and professional guidelines.

  6. Ongoing assessment and ree… Read full answer

    Source: https://hireabo.com/job/7_0_0/Clinical%20Psychologist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *